Showing posts with label 12. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 12. Show all posts
Thursday, October 9, 2014
12 reasons why I remain optimistic
Its hard to find optimistic posts out in the peak oil wilds, so I liked this one from Bob Waldrop - 12 reasons why I remain optimistic.
Read More..
Here are twelve reasons why I remain optimistic in spite of all the bad news and scary stories. I am not in denial about the bad news, nor do I think we shouldn’t note and comment upon the situations coming upon us, but I also think that it’s important to keep such things in perspective.
1. Reality is very complex. . . . and there are limits to what we can know. I don’t understand why the system didn’t collapse 30 years ago. I don’t understand why the US and Russia did not have a massive nuclear war. As much as I want to be a “know-it-all”, my lack of understanding is a commentary on the limitations of my observation and knowledge. We can’t see all the details of our threats and how they interact to create a dysergistic downwards spiral. . . but we also can’t see all the details of the solutions at play, and how they interact to mitigate dysergy/dystopia. Complexity theory is, well, complex, but one thing that is evident is the ability of seemingly small and insignificant actions to have far-reaching effects (cf the “butterfly effect”).
2. The mainstream media report a distorted version of reality from the perspective of the ruling authorities. While there are occasional exceptions to the rule, the mainstream media are as dominated by our ruling authorities as the media of the old Soviet Union. Perhaps the primary difference is that our mainstream media are controlled by various factions of ruling authorities, so what we are getting as “news” is actually arguments among the ruling authorities. Why is this good news? Because we know it is so, and it’s not just “we” as in “those actively concerned about sustainability”. Mainstream news media credibility is low and getting lower all the time.
3. We have a “sidestream” media that tells us the rest of the story. A million flowers of hope are blooming out there, but you will only find them by looking for them in the sidestream media. They won’t be fed to you on the evening national news.
4. The powers that be are not nearly as smart and omnipotent and omniscient as they want everyone to believe they are. Here again, a good example is the old Soviet Union. Their ruling elites had massive state resources at their control. They could literally do anything they wanted with their natural and economic resources. The Soviet Union had a well-established system of terror complete with concentration camps to compel obedience. Yet, the day came when the inherent contradictions of their system overwhelmed them, and they collapsed of their own stupidity, greed and venality. In our present situation, the evidence is abundant that the various factions of our powers that be are as clueless as the Romanoffs in 1917 or the French aristocracy in the late 18th century. We are full-on in the middle of a classical case of imperial over-reach, and as it is said, those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them. Our aristocracies are not learning from the mistakes of history, so they are repeating them, and that means that they are doomed. They have been weighed in the balances and found wanting, their days are numbered, their kingdoms will be divided and given to others.
5. We have a dense and robust civil society system that provides an alternative source of authority and direction as an alternative to the powers that be. While certainly some parts of that civil society are core members of various factions of our ruling authorities, there is a tremendous amount of non-ruling authority organizational activity at play in our system. The historical tragedy of the Soviet collapse is that they had no civil society to step into the breech and point the way to a better future, so they got stuck with a form of gangster capitalism that is slowly evolving back to a Soviet-style political tyranny. In our situation, as the establishment crumbles, alternative structures are being created all around us. We are learning what we need to do right now, before major crisis/collapse comes upon us. That gives us the opportunity to possibly stage a managed recovery, and to mitigate the risk of outright collapse.
6. We have the internet. The internet and its quick and ubiquitous global connections is a structure whose invention is as much a turning point in history as was the creation of the first printing presses, and for many of the same reasons. I am a nobody, a pissant Oklahoma rednecked peasant with an education and an attitude, yet every year, more than a million people from 108 different countries find their way to one or more of my websites and download an average of three pages of information, and this has been going on for years. My printable flyers alone have been downloaded more than 150,000 times. And there must be ten million or more folks just like me, using the internet to organize, agitate, activate, comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Consider the phenomena associated with Wikileaks. One tyrant has already been deposed, and more are reportedly at risk, all because of the bravery of one soldier in the trenches of the Middle East, and the distributed internet structure of the Wikileaks organization. That’s inspiration!
7. We know more about the actual details of living more sustainably. We are recovering from the almost complete collapse of the generational transmission of cultural knowledge and wisdom of the past 100 years, and are advancing our knowledge of how to live more sustainably at a rapid pace. As new ideas are tested, they spread very quickly across the globe. China now has CSAs, the sidestream media reported this week. The design discipline of permaculture offers a growing body of theory, knowledge, and praxis regarding the design of human habitations and systems that care for people, care for the planet, and have a care for the future.
8. We know about our approaching threats — peak oil, climate instability, economic irrationality, and their associated consequences. We can see them coming and people worldwide are taking action to adapt, avert, mitigate, stop, slow down, repair, recover. All of these issues are players in the public debate. And while it remains true that these issues and our response to them are hotly contested by powerful ruling factions, the fact that they are being contested at all is a triumph of the ability of civil society to place something on the table and force a hearing. That is the first step to structural change for the better.
9. Despite the best efforts of ruling authorities, the fact remains that structures of economics and governance can grow from the ground up and replace existing systems. Even as we speak, a new “super-structure” is being grown, spreading organically with the tenacity of Bermuda grass, utilizing rhizomes, runners, and abundant self-seeding. Every time an organic garden is planted. . . a food cooperative is organized. . . a CSA gets started. . . a permaculture class is taught. . . a family voluntarily decides to limit their consumption . . . a new structure is started to replace the collapsing ruins of the old, indeed, these are structures that will protect us from being caught amidst the falling debris of the old.
10. Much has been made of the possibility of Black Swan Events that can cause major systemic problems. But since we are speaking of random events in complex processes, we can also think about the potential for White Swan Events that can drive major progress for the structures of sustainable living that we are all involved with. A recent example of a White Swan Event is the Wikileaks event. The collapse of the Soviet Empire was another such a White Swan Event. With the Soviet Union’s rapid demise, the forces of goodness and wisdom were not organized enough to have a significant impact on the direction of subsequent events. But with Wikileaks, the situation is completely different. One tyrant has already been deposed, and more may be on that list as the situation develops.
11. The credibility of the existing system is at an all-time low. All over the globe, the corruptions and oppressions of ruling factions are being exposed, in detail, with chapter and verse, in often glittering technicolor. Tens of millions of people trusted the stock market and lost everything. They trusted the real estate market and lost everything. They trusted the corporation they worked for, and they got laid off. They trusted the academic system and bought a useless degree at a high price. One of the early steps to fundamental change is that people come to understand that their existing systems are failing them, indeed, that they are being exploited by their existing systems in order to enrich and benefit others. That’s happening right now, 24/7/365, and that process has increasing velocity.
12. We — that is to say, people concerned about peak oil, climate instability, economic irrationality — are everywhere. The United States has about 186,000 election precincts, each with an average of about 1600 people. Does anyone doubt that within the overwhelming majority of those little “villages” there are people intentionally involved with sustainable living? No, I don’t have a mailing list handy, but I think this claim is likely true. If a crisis occurs, whether it be a Black Swan or White Swan, or simply the fact that unsustainable systems by definition do not continue indefinitely, we are in position to get there the firstest with the mostest, with knowledge, organizing ability, and successful examples. The fact that we are not nationally organized to do this doesn’t mean squat. Indeed, a national organization would likely get in the way of effective and rapid action. Change is created one neighborhood at a time, by the people who live there. This is why I don’t worry about the fact that 100 million people have not signed up for sustainable living. As event unfold, there will be a morning when a hundred million and more wake up and decide they need to do something different. Our historical task right now is to get ready for that crisis awakening. When people are ready to storm the Bastille, organizers will be critical, and that’s our job. Politics, like nature, abhors a vacuum, and if we who embrace goodness, beauty, and wisdom don’t get there the firstest with the mostest, someone else will, and we might not like what results thereafter.
So, as it turns out, it’s not over until its over, and in spite of all the tumult and rage, I remain an unreconstructed optimist about how this will play out over time. I doubt I will see this process to its conclusion, but the strong foundations being laid right now will serve us well in the earthquakes of the future.
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Physical sciences news 12 17 07 12 23 07
- Gamma-ray bursts
- There are several types of gamma-ray events that go under the name of "gamma-ray bursts", but the two main categories are "long" and "short" – referring to the duration of the burst. Long bursts have been generally attributed to very energetic supernovae that direct most of their energy into a narrow beam, which just happens to be visible from Earth. But most powerful supernovae are due to the collapse of a very large, young star – normally found only inside galaxies. So the detection of a long gamma-ray burst outside of any visible galaxy is rather a surprise. On the other hand, short gamma-ray bursts have been suspected to result from the merger of black holes and/or neurton stars. So another surprise is that the LIGO gravitational wave detector did not register any such event in connection with a recent short gamma-ray burst event.
• Intergalactic Shot In The Dark Shocks Astronomers
• Cosmic explosion detonates in empty space
• A Gamma-Ray Burst Out of Nowhere
• Baffling Cosmic Explosion Comes Out of Nowhere
• Cosmic explosion is shot in the dark
• LIGO Sheds Light on Cosmic Event - Supernova remnants
- It has generally been supposed that most elements heavier than hydrogen and helium that are not still locked up inside stars were formed in very massive stars that became supernovae and scattered most of their material into space. But actual traces of such "dust" in the vicinity of known supernova remnants have not been confirmed – until now.
• 10,000 Earths Worth Of Fresh Dust Found Near Star Explosion
• Litterbugs of the Universe Busted
• Freshly Formed Dust in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant as Revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope - Very early star formation
- Given that interstellar dust contained within galaxies is the result of supernovae explosions of previous generations of massive stars (see above), it is surprising that a galaxy seen as it was only 1.5 billions years after the big bang exhibits a very high rate of star formation (1000 times what now occurs in the Milky Way), and in a very dusty environment besides. But thats exactly what the galaxy GOODS 850-5 seems to show.
• New View of Distant Galaxy Reveals Furious Star Formation
• Galaxy Has 1,000 Times Our Rate of Star Formation
• GOODS 850-5 -- A z>4 Galaxy Discovered in the Submillimeter? - Cosmic inflation
- Although the cosmic microwave background (CMB) represents an image of the universe at about 380,000 years after the big bang, some very subtle details of the variation in temperature of the CMB from point to point contain information about the very earliest instants of the universe. (Like time t=10-35 sec, to be more precise.) It has been expected that a very careful analysis of the data will tell us something about the hypothesized phenomenon of cosmic inflation. The latest analysis claims to rule out the simplest model of inflation. However, it may be that the data obtained in the WMAP mission is insufficiently detailed for a satisfactory resolution of this issue, and well have to wait for a more sensitive measurement from the forthcoming Planck mission.
• No Dice for Slow Roll?
• Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence
• Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence - Mars
- Data gathered from many years of surveillance of Mars by satellite missions and landers provides strong indications that Mars was warm and wet early in its history. Yet evidence of the most likely greenhouse gas, CO2, that could have sustained a warm, wet environment has been conspicuously absent. The evidence now points to a different greenhouse gas, SO2, instead. But early history aside, it now looks as though Mars could have an active (water ice) glacier at the present time.
• Sulfur dioxide may have helped maintain a warm early Mars
• Fire and Brimstone Helped Form Mars Oceans
• Possible solution to Mars enigma
• Maybe Sulfur Dioxide, Not Carbon Dioxide, Kept Mars Warm
• Greenhouse clue to water on Mars
• How Mars Could Have Been Warm And Wet But Limestone Free
• Red Planet Still Packs Surprises
• Active glacier found on Mars
• Red Planet Appears to Host Active Glacier - Extrasolar planets
- How much technology would be required to learn something about the surface conditions (e. g. continents, oceans, clouds) on extrasolar planets in our neighborhood? New calculations based on plausible strategies for observing such features suggest... not a whole lot more technology than we will soon have. So if there are any civilizations at least as advanced as our own on any of those planets, they probably already have a fair idea of what Earth is like.
• Alien astronomers could discern Earths features
• To curious aliens, Earth would stand out as living planet
• MIT Asks: How Would Extraterrestrial Astronomers Study Earth? - Sea level rise
- A rise in sea levels is one of the most troublesome effects expected from global warming over the next several hundred years, but it has been difficult to make a good estimate of how quickly this would happen. However, about 124,000 years ago the planet was on average about 2° C warmer than it is now – and what it may be in just 100 years. New research claims to show that sea levels then were rising at a rate of 1.5 meters per century – about twice the current "consensus" forecast for our own times.
• Study suggests future sea-level rises may be even higher than predicted
• Rising seas to beat predictions
• Lessons From an Interglacial Past
• Fast-Rising Sea Levels: An Interview on Research in the Red Seas
Friday, September 12, 2014
Readings 12 September 2007
Todays edition deals with psychology and neuroscience
The text following each item is quoted material, except for editorial comments, which are in color.
As Gould and Murdock worry about their sons, molecular geneticist Michael Wigler, a few miles away at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, believes he and his colleagues are on the cusp of understanding why autism occurs and how some families can be affected more than once. Wigler and his team have discovered how certain spontaneous genetic mutations are relatively common and how they can be passed on by very healthy parents to their offspring.
Its unfortunate, as the article points out, that parents of autistic children misconstrue the idea that autism is a consequence of genetic errors to be "blaming the parents". Perhaps this is partly a holdover from earlier hypotheses, which now seem very mistaken, that autism is a consequence of bad parenting. An example of this idea, sometimes called the "refigerator mother" theory of autism, was promulgated by the once-influential but now mostly discredited Freudian psychoanalyst Bruno Bettelheim. As some people who have had him as a teacher can testify, Bruno had serious psychological issues of his own.
For a press release that describes Wiglers research, see here. Another article on the research: here. Additional but different research on neurological aspects of autism: here.
Human brains are considerably more complicated, with additional neural systems that seek romance, others that want comfort and companionship, and others that are just out for a roll in the hay.
"Love makes the world go round" has served as an epigram to inspire a number of popular songs over the years. A more cynical point of view would suggest that its the mating instinct that makes the world go round. Or even more crudely, its sex that makes the world go round. Whatever. In any case, in humans this impulse manifests itself within their brains in a variety of elaborate and complicated ways.
And guys wont be surprised to learn that women are much choosier about partners than they are.
"Just because people say theyre looking for a particular set of characteristics in a mate, someone like themselves, doesnt mean that is what theyll end up choosing," Peter M. Todd, of the cognitive science program at Indiana University, Bloomington, said in a telephone interview.
Researchers led by Todd report in Tuesdays edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that their study found humans were similar to most other mammals, "following Darwins principle of choosy females and competitive males, even if humans say something different."
If these findings arent obvious to you, perhaps youre still a little wet behind the ears... More on this research: here, here, here.
For now, thanks to psychologists at the University of Texas at Austin, we can at last count the whys. After asking nearly 2,000 people why they’d had sex, the researchers have assembled and categorized a total of 237 reasons — everything from “I wanted to feel closer to God” to “I was drunk.” They even found a few people who claimed to have been motivated by the desire to have a child.
This is so quintessentially human – the need for novelty and variety is so great that humans need to think of so many rationalizations for what essentially boils down to: reproduction. More on this research: here, here.
The study participants, college students, had no idea that their social instincts were being deliberately manipulated. On the way to the laboratory, they had bumped into a laboratory assistant, who was holding textbooks, a clipboard, papers and a cup of hot or iced coffee — and asked for a hand with the cup.
That was all it took: The students who held a cup of iced coffee rated a hypothetical person they later read about as being much colder, less social and more selfish than did their fellow students, who had momentarily held a cup of hot java. ...
Psychologists say that “priming” people in this way is not some form of hypnotism, or even subliminal seduction; rather, it’s a demonstration of how everyday sights, smells and sounds can selectively activate goals or motives that people already have.
Gee, you dont suppose, do you, that this sort of mechanism is at work when somebody notices a person of the opposite sex wearing clothing that has connotations of, say, power, affluence, or allure – and decides that it might be advantageous to become better acquainted with that person... and can think of 237 reasons for that....
But aside from that, this idea of "priming" also reminds me of the following:
For their current research, the scientists asked students to think about their own death or a control topic and then read campaign statements of three hypothetical political candidates, each with a different leadership style: "charismatic" (i.e. those emphasizing greatness of the nation and a heroic victory over evil, as described above), task-oriented or relationship-oriented. Following a reminder of death, there was almost an 800 percent increase in votes for the charismatic leader, but no increase for the two other candidates.
This research came out in 2004. But it seems appropriate to remember any time one observes would-be "leaders" who seem to talk a lot about "9/11" or "War on Terror" or "Al Qaeda". Theres a very recent and prescient article on this connection here.
Heres a delightful article on many other ways that our brains/minds can play tricks on us, by the versatile writer George Johnson, whom I recently had the pleasure of meeting. It shows, once again, how easily we can be misled by others who are motivated to do so (including, sometimes, our unconscious selves).
Ironically, and very sadly, the parrot mentioned in the article, named Alex, has just died. Obituaries: here, here, here, here, here, here.
Two procedures – which are the first to imitate an out-of-body experience artificially – use cameras to fool people into thinking they are standing or sitting somewhere else in a room. They provide the strongest proof yet that people only imagine floating out of their bodies during surgery or near-death experiences.
"The brain can trick itself, and when it is trying to interpret sensory information, the image it produces doesnt have to be a real representation," says Henrik Ehrsson, of the Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK, who designed the first experiment.
Accidental or deliberate deceptions of the mind, like this one (perpetrated by oneself or others) – besides simply chemical influences such as alcohol or other drugs – show how convincingly the mind can be fooled given the right conditions. Such findings seem able to account for experiences that people describe as "religious" or "spirtual" or "numinous" or the like.
Other reports on this research: here, here, here, here, here, here, here.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)